Thoracic aortic aneurysms, a single center's 10-years experience and analysis of outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, p = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; p = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (p = .001), but not with higher mortality rates (p = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.

Coral Reef Aorta: Literature Review and Analysis of the Published Cases in the Last 20 Years.

BACKGROUND: Coral reef aorta (CRA) is defined by the presence of heavily calcified exophytic plaques that protrude into the aortic lumen. However, the exact causes and development of this condition are still not fully understood. When the aortic branches are affected, it can result in various symptoms. Despite ongoing research, there is currently no established consensus on the best treatment for CRA. This review aims to examine the latest findings regarding the clinical presentation and approach to treating patients with CRA. METHODS: We conducted a systematic electronic search of the literature using the PubMed and Embase databases. Throughout the search, we adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA framework. From the identified publications, we extracted information pertaining to patients' characteristics, symptoms, and types of treatment from a total of 124 cases reported over the past 20 years. The primary focus of our analysis was to assess the improvement of signs and symptoms, as well as to evaluate any postoperative complications. To achieve this, we performed both descriptive and inferential analyses on the collected data. Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses based on treatment types and symptoms observed at presentation, presenting the findings in the form of odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: After removing duplicate articles, we carefully screened the titles of 67 retrieved articles and excluded those that did not align with the purpose of our study. Subsequently, we thoroughly analyzed the remaining 41 articles along with their references, ultimately including 29 studies that were deemed most relevant for our systematic review. We examined a total of 124 cases of patients diagnosed with CRA, comprising 77 (62.1%) females and 48 (38.7%) males, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 37-84). The predominant signs and symptoms observed were intermittent claudication, reported in 57 (46.0%) patients, followed by refractory hypertension in 45 (36.3%) patients, intestinal angina in 28 (22.6%) patients, and renal insufficiency in 15 (12.1%) patients. Among the treated patients, 110 (88.7%) underwent open surgery repair (OSR), 11 (8.9%) received endovascular treatment, and 3 (2.4%) underwent laparoscopy. Postoperatively, a significant number of patients experienced substantial relief or complete resolution of their symptoms, as well as improved control of hypertension and renal function. In the group of patients treated with OSR, the inhospital stay mortality rate was 10.9%, the morbidity rate was 28.2%, and the reintervention rate was 15.5%. The high mortality rate during hospital stays in this group may be associated with such invasive procedures performed on patients who have substantial cardiovascular burden and multiple comorbidities. Conversely, no postoperative complications were reported in the group of patients treated with endovascular procedures or laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While coral reef aorta (CRA) is considered a rare condition, it is crucial for the medical community to remain vigilant about its diagnosis, particularly in patients presenting with symptoms such as intermittent claudication, refractory hypertension, renal impairment, or intestinal angina. Based on the findings of this review, both OSR and endovascular treatment have shown promise as viable therapeutic options. Although endovascular therapies may not always be feasible or may have reduced durability in these calcified bulky lesions, they should be considered in patients with multiple comorbidities, due to the high postoperative mortality rates associated with more invasive approaches. Additionally, these endoluminal procedures have demonstrated good patency rates during the 18-month follow-up period. It is essential to emphasize that the treatment strategy should be determined on a case-by-case basis, involving a multidisciplinary team to tailor it to the specific needs of each individual patient.

Effect of Chronic Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medication in Neck Hematoma and Perioperative Outcomes after Carotid Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective analysis of neck hematoma, stroke, and mortality after symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was conducted, to determine the most appropriate perioperative medication for these patients. Thirty-day outcomes of moderate and severe neck bleeding were also investigated. METHODS: Patients undergoing CEA in a Vascular Surgery department were analyzed (2015-2019). Preprocedure antithrombotic medication (from the 5 days prior to surgery) was identified. End point predictors were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses and adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 304 CEA were included. Almost half of the included patients (49.67%) were under low-dose aspirin, 17.55% other single antiplatelet agent, 12.59% dual antiplatelet therapy, 8.61% anticoagulation, and 10.92% no antithrombotic therapy. There was a 8.22% rate of important hematoma, including 4.93% severe (requiring surgical exploration) hematomas and a 30-day all-stroke incidence of 2.94% in symptomatic and 1.79% asymptomatic patients (P = 0.51). When compared to aspirin, severe hematoma was more prevalent with single clopidogrel or triflusal (relative risk [RR] 4.25, P = 0.11), dual antiplatelet group (RR 11.84, P = 0.002), and anticoagulation (RR 8.604, P = 0.02). Dual antiaggregation and anticoagulation did not confer postoperative stroke protection compared to single aspirin in either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients. Nonsignificant higher intrahospital mortality was noted in no medication, dual antiplatelet, and anticoagulation groups in contrast to aspirin. Severe neck bleeding was associated with increased congestive heart failure (9.26-fold, P = 0.03) and longer hospital stay (11.20 ± 24.69 days vs. 3.18 ± 4.79 with no bleeding, P < 0.001), with a tendency for higher hospital readmission at 30 days (4.66-fold, P = 0.13). Mortality and stroke rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Double antiaggregation and anticoagulation did not confer better perioperative outcomes after elective CEA in our study. These regimens were associated with an increased risk of neck hematoma, especially severe bleeding, with similar rates of neurologic events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and no mortality benefit. Monotherapy with aspirin appears to be the safest perioperative antithrombotic regimen for elective CEA.

Determinants of Quality of Life in Patients with Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) may develop in up to 50% of patients after deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and may reduce patients' quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate the association of PTS severity with QoL in patients with proximal DVT submitted for medical treatment and also to identify modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors related to PTS. METHODS: Patients with iliac or femoropopliteal DVT observed in Vascular Surgery consultation in our institution from 1 year period with unilateral DVT were selected. Patients with total vein recanalization were excluded. Villalta scale was applied to assess PTS degree and VEINES-QoL/Sym questionnaire was used as a disease-specific QoL measure. Correlation between PTS degree and VEINES-QoL/Sym score and predictors of PTS were determined. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were accepted to enter the study. From those, 66.1% were female, 64.3% (n = 36) had iliac and 35.7% (n = 20) femoropopliteal DVT. PTS was present in 52.8% of iliac and 65.0% of femoropopliteal DVT patients observed for consultation (P = 0.41). There was a significant correlation with PTS degree and both VEINES-QoL and VEINES-Sym scores (P < 0.01). Major depression (odds ratio OR = 5.63, P = 0.04) and regular wear of compressing stockings (OR = 4.69, P = 0.04) were the only independent factors associated with PTS. Patients with depression had lower QoL scores, while patients with PTS who wear compression stockings had similar QoL scores compared to patients without PTS. Ultrasound alterations (OR = 3.28, P = 0.17), age, gender, iliac DVT, multiple DVT and time after DVT (P > 0.20) were not associated with PTS syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: VEINES-QoL/Sym had moderate inverse correlation with PTS degree. Depression was associated with both PTS and lower QoL scores. Patients with PTS criteria compliant to wearing compressing stockings had similar QoL scores to patients without PTS.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Q Fever: An Odd Connection to Keep in Mind.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) secondary to Coxiella burnetii infections are rare but carry important implications. The diagnosis is difficult due to unspecific symptoms. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first AAA caused by chronic Q fever treated with an endoprosthesis.

Is There an Impact of COVID-19 on Admission of Patients to the Emergency Department for Vascular Surgery?

BACKGROUND: On March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak a pandemic. During this period, surgical activity and admission to the Emergency Department (ED) decreased globally. The aim of this article is to understand how the admission of a patient to the ED for vascular surgery changed in our center in Portugal and if this situation prevented urgent surgical procedures. METHODS: Through a retrospective study, we compared the volume of patients admitted to the ED during the emergency state (ES) in Portugal with the same period in 2019. In addition, we analyzed the urgent surgical activity during the ES and in the correspondent period of the previous 10 years, regarding limb acute ischemia, acute aortic pathology, and vascular trauma. Two groups of patients were formed-patients operated during the ES and during the non-ES, for control. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS® Statistics, version 25. RESULTS: In the ES, 115 patients were observed at the ED and 179 in the 2019 corresponding period. During the ES, patients significantly recurred less to the ED directly from home (P < 0.001) and were less referred to the ED by primary care doctors (P < 0.001). Patients observed at the ED were significantly more urgent-required urgent surgery or were admitted to the department-than those in 2019 (40% vs. 24%). However, there were no differences when only considering urgent surgery (14% in ES vs. 10% in 2019). In the ES, 38% of patients observed at the ED were discharged with no follow-up related to vascular surgery against 60% in 2019, although this difference was not significant. Compared with the preceding 10 years, there are not significant differences in the number of patients who underwent urgent surgery in both ES and non-ES periods. In patients with acute limb ischemia, we did not find an increase in the time between onset of symptoms and ED admission, during the ES. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer patients were admitted at the ED during the ES, and those admitted were significantly more urgent. We did not find a decrease in the number of urgent surgeries when compared with the preceding 10 years. Therefore, we cannot assume that coronavirus pandemic precluded urgent surgical procedures.

[The Impact of Patient Transfer After Rupture of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm]. / O Impacto da Transferência de Doentes após Rutura de Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal.

OBJECTIVE: determine whether patient transfer adversely affects the survival of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) patients after conventional surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing attempted repair of an rAAA at a tertiary center, over January 2008 and December 2014. Patients were divided into those presenting directly to our center and those transferred from another hospital. The main outcome variable was 24-hour or 30-day mortality, with secondary variables including time to surgical treatment, length of intensive care unit stay and total length hospitalization. RESULTS: 78 patients (88% men) underwent attempted open repair of an rAAA during this period, 69% (54 cases) were transferred from another institution. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities and hemodynamic stability. The overall mortality rate was 51% at 30 days. Transferred patients took twice as long as direct patients to get to the operating room (median 7,9 vs. 3,9 horas, p < 0,05), Although the difference for surgery treatment, there was no difference in 24-hour and 30-day mortality between the transferred group and direct group (26% e 50% vs. 29% e 58%, p < 0,05). Mean intensive care unit stay (median, 12 vs. 4 dias, p = 0,04) and total hospitalization (median 11 vs. 4 dias, p = 0,04) were sustantially superior in the transferred group. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of patients with RAAA in this series results in a doubling of the time interval between initial patient presentation and arrival in the operating room. This, however, did not result in any disadvantage in the survival rate between the groups. The total length and resources consumption were higher in the transfer group. These results may be attributed to a pre-selection of patients (clinically stable) who are able to tolerate such a delay in surgical treatment, secondary to transfer.

Objetivo: Determinar se a transferência inter-hospitalar afecta adversamente a sobrevida de doentes com rutura de aneurisma da aorta abdominal (rAAA), submetidos a cirurgia convencional. Métodos: Efetuamos uma análise retrospetiva dos rAAA tratados sequencialmente por cirurgia convencional, num centro de referenciação terciária, no período compreendido entre janeiro 2008 e dezembro de 2014. Os casos foram divididos entre os que se apresentram diretamente neste centro e os que foram alvo de transferência. Analisou-se a mortalidade às 24 horas, a mortalidade aos 30 dias e, como outcomes secundários, incluíram-se o tempo de chegada ao bloco operatório, duração de internamento na unidade de cuidados intensivos (UCI) e o tempo de internamento total. Resultados: Neste período, um total de 78 casos (88% do género masculino) foram submetidos a cirurgia convencional por rAAA, 69% (54 casos) transferidos de outra instituição. Ambos os grupos mostraram semelhanças nas características demográficas, bem como no perfil de comorbilidades e estadio de estabilidade hemodinâmica. A mortalidade global foi de 51% aos 30 dias. O tempo de chegada ao bloco operatório do grupo transferido foi 2 vezes superior (mediana 7,9 vs. 3,9 horas, p < 0,05). Apesar da diferença para início da prestração de cuidados cirúrgicos específicos, a mortalidade às 24 horas e aos 30 dias não diferiu entre entre o grupo transferido e o direto (26% e 50% vs. 29% e 58%, p < 0,05) respectivamente. O tempo de internamento na UCI (mediana, 12 vs. 4 dias, p = 0,04) e a duração total de internamento (mediana 11 vs. 4 dias, p = 0,04) foram substancialmente maiores para o grupo transferido. Conclusões: O resultado da transferência inter-hospitalar, nesta série de doentes, resultou numa duplicação do tempo de admissão no bloco operatório Contudo, não se verificou qualquer desvantagem em relação à sobrevida entre os grupos. A duração da hospitalização e consumo de recursos foi maior no grupo transferido. Estes resultados podem dever-se à possível seleção de doentes transferidos (clinicamente estáveis) que conseguem tolerar o atraso na instituição do tratamento cirúrgico, decorrente da transferência.